see nothing wrong with this form of institutionalised corruption the udm is left with no choice but to seek legal opinion on this matter and to establish whether it cannot approach the courts for redress as we did when we took the floor crossing legislation to the constitutional court there is a clear conflict of interest when the party that governs is first in line for government tenders we cannot give it another name this could also possibly mean that the guarantees government so eagerly approves are nothing other than a sophisticated method for the ruling party to extract private wealth from the public purse