all of this speaks to the fact that an effective anticorruption unit ought to be located as far away from the saps and the executive as possible anticorruption units elsewhere report to parliament and not to the executive what is before us here today is a bill that establishes an entity within the saps that flouts saps regulations and allows a junior to supersede a superior officer who on the other hand in the constitution controls the saps in its entirety what has been created is necessary to speak to the judgement but what has been created is also actually a convoluted constitutional conundrum nowhere is there a clause in the constitution which reads that the national commissioner controls all of the saps